0.04/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.09 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 1920 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 240 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 08:29:19 EDT 2025 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.37 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p 0.15/0.47 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.15/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA. 0.15/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.47 # Starting lpo1_fix with 720s (3) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting almost_fo_4 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting new_ho_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # full_lambda_9 with pid 806 completed with status 0 0.15/0.47 # Result found by full_lambda_9 0.15/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA. 0.15/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.47 # Starting lpo1_fix with 720s (3) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true) 0.15/0.47 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN 0.15/0.47 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN 0.15/0.47 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.15/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 20s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # full_lambda_5 with pid 822 completed with status 0 0.15/0.47 # Result found by full_lambda_5 0.15/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA. 0.15/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.47 # Starting lpo1_fix with 720s (3) cores 0.15/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true) 0.15/0.47 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN 0.15/0.47 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN 0.15/0.47 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.15/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 20s (1) cores 0.15/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s 0.15/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.47 0.15/0.47 # Proof found! 0.15/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_23, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_24, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_26, type, in: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_48, type, ordsucc: $i > $i). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_62, type, imp: $o > $o > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_63, type, d_not: $o > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_68, type, l_or: $o > $o > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_73, type, l_some: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_78, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_124, type, nat: $i). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_125, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_128, type, n_some: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_148, type, diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_149, type, d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_150, type, iii: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_152, type, moreis: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_153, type, lessis: $i > $i > $o). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_156, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.15/0.47 thf(decl_157, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_d_not, axiom, ((d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:((imp @ ((X36)) @ (~($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_d_not)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_imp, axiom, ((imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(((X34)=>(X35))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_imp)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_iii, axiom, ((iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X185 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_iii)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_l_or, axiom, ((l_or)=(^[X42:$o]:(imp @ ((d_not @ ((X42))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_l_or)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_e_is, axiom, ((e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(((X60)=(X61))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_e_is)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_lessis, axiom, ((lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X188:$i]:((l_or @ ((iii @ X1 @ X188)) @ ((n_is @ X1 @ X188)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_lessis)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_n_some, axiom, ((n_some)=(l_some @ nat)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_n_some)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_n_is, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_n_is)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((is_of @ X4 @ X3)=>(X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_all_of)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_is_of)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, ((d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X1 @ X184))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_d_29_ii)). 0.15/0.47 thf(def_moreis, axiom, ((moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X187:$i]:((l_or @ ((d_29_ii @ X1 @ X187)) @ ((n_is @ X1 @ X187)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', def_moreis)). 0.15/0.47 thf(satz25c, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X329:$i]:((in @ X329 @ nat))) @ (^[X330:$i]:(((iii @ X330 @ X1)=>(lessis @ (ordsucc @ X330) @ X1)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', satz25c)). 0.15/0.47 thf(satz25a, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X325:$i]:((in @ X325 @ nat))) @ (^[X326:$i]:(((d_29_ii @ X326 @ X1)=>(moreis @ X326 @ (ordsucc @ X1))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5F9CkwfRJe/E---3.1_676.p', satz25a)). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$o]:(((((Z0))=>(~($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((imp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(((Z0)=>(Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((l_or)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:((((((((Z0)))=>(~($true)))))=>(Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_or])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$o]:(((((Z0))=>(~($true))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((e_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((lessis)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))))=>(~($true)))))=>((((Z0)=(Z1))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lessis])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, def_n_some])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((l_or)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:((((((((Z0)))=>(~($true)))))=>(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_15]), c_0_18])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_23, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, c_0_19])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_25, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_26, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_27, plain, ((lessis)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))))=>(~($true)))))=>((((Z0)=(Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_28, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((moreis)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))))=>(~($true)))))=>((((Z0)=(Z1))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_moreis])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_30, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, def_n_some])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ~(![X422:$i]:(((in @ X422 @ nat)=>![X421:$i]:(((in @ X421 @ nat)=>((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X422 @ X421))=>(((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X422 @ (ordsucc @ X421)))=>~($true))=>((ordsucc @ X421)=(X422))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz25c])]), c_0_27]), c_0_21]), c_0_28])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_32, plain, ((moreis)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((((((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))))=>(~($true)))))=>((((Z0)=(Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30]), c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk1_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk2_0 @ nat)&((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))&((~(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk1_0 @ (ordsucc @ esk2_0)))|~($true))&((ordsucc @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])])])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X568:$i]:(((in @ X568 @ nat)=>![X567:$i]:(((in @ X567 @ nat)=>((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X567 @ X568))=>(((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X567 @ (ordsucc @ X568)))=>~($true))=>((X567)=(ordsucc @ X568)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz25a]), c_0_30]), c_0_28]), c_0_32])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (~((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk1_0 @ (ordsucc @ esk2_0))))|~(($true))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X807:$i, X808:$i]:((((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X808 @ (ordsucc @ X807)))|((X808)=(ordsucc @ X807))|~(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X808 @ X807))|~(in @ X808 @ nat)|~(in @ X807 @ nat))&(($true)|((X808)=(ordsucc @ X807))|~(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X808 @ X807))|~(in @ X808 @ nat)|~(in @ X807 @ nat)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])])])])])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ~((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk1_0 @ (ordsucc @ esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:(((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X1 @ (ordsucc @ X4)))|((X1)=(ordsucc @ X4))|~((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X1 @ X4)))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk2_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk1_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ((ordsucc @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 0.15/0.47 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38]), c_0_39]), c_0_40]), c_0_41])]), c_0_42]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.47 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 404 0.15/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 231 0.15/0.47 # Initial clauses : 427 0.15/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 189 0.15/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 238 0.15/0.47 # Processed clauses : 485 0.15/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 5 0.15/0.47 # ...subsumed : 88 0.15/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 392 0.15/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 32 0.15/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.15/0.47 # Generated clauses : 909 0.15/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 855 0.15/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2 0.15/0.47 # Paramodulations : 712 0.15/0.47 # Factorizations : 2 0.15/0.47 # NegExts : 2 0.15/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 36 0.15/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 96 0.15/0.47 # ...of those cached : 61 0.15/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 205 0.15/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 70 0.15/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7 0.15/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 9 0.15/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 119 0.15/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 765 0.15/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 2541 0.15/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 165 0.15/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10348 0.15/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2418 0.15/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 76 0.15/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 300 0.15/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 32 0.15/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 128 0.15/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 4 0.15/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 79713 0.15/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 20864 0.15/0.47 0.15/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.47 # User time : 0.059 s 0.15/0.47 # System time : 0.005 s 0.15/0.47 # Total time : 0.064 s 0.15/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 5512 pages 0.15/0.47 0.15/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.47 # User time : 0.064 s 0.15/0.47 # System time : 0.008 s 0.15/0.47 # Total time : 0.072 s 0.15/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 2408 pages 0.15/0.47 % E exiting 0.15/0.47 % E exiting 0.15/0.47 EOF